chartered
accountants
A
member of: urbach hacker young
international
Telephone
(416) 226-6800
2001 FEDERAL BUDGET
BUDGET
HIGHLIGHTS
On December 10, 2001, Finance Minister Paul Martin delivered
his first full budget in twenty-two months and the first in the aftermath of
September 11. Consequently, most of the
new initiatives introduced in the Budget are targeted towards inland security.
In total, the Budget introduces a $7.7 billion security package, which includes
$6.5 billion for areas such as air security and funding for the military, while
another $1.2 billion has been earmarked for border initiatives. In part, the
money for these efforts will come from a new security charge on air travelers
of either $12 or $24 per ticket purchased, commencing April 2002.
While the previously announced tax relief measures
introduced in the February 28, 2000 budget and the October 18, 2000 mini-budget
were left intact, very few new tax initiatives were incorporated into the
current Budget.
The following sections summarize the major tax
initiatives.
Deferral
of Corporate Tax Instalments for Small Businesses
In order to provide a cash flow
benefit to small corporations, many of which are facing serious challenges as
the economy has slowed, the Budget proposes to defer payment of their federal
corporate income and capital tax instalments for the months of January,
February and March 2002 for a period of at least six months, without interest
or penalties. Corporations will qualify for this instalment deferral if they
are resident in Canada and if they, together with associated corporations, do
not have more than $15 million of taxable capital employed in Canada in the
previous taxation year. In respect of provinces that have a corporate tax
collection agreement with the federal government, eligible corporations will
also be able to defer their provincial income tax instalments for the same period. Since Ontario is a province that does not have a corporate tax collection
agreement with the federal government, Ontario
income and capital tax instalments will continue to be required.
Currently, corporations must
make their final payment of taxes owing for a taxation year two or three months
after the end of that year (the balance-due day). To ensure that all small
corporations effectively benefit from at least a six-month deferral of their
January, February and March 2002 instalments, the balance-due day for federal
tax purposes will also be extended, in circumstances where it would have
otherwise occurred before a deferred instalment payment. Furthermore, any deferred instalment payment
that would otherwise be payable after year-end, but before the balance-due day
for the year, will be due only on the balance-due day.
The following table sets out
the schedule for the deferral of instalments and the deadline for making
balance-due day payments:
Schedule for Deferred Tax Instalments and Balance-Due Day
|
Taxation |
|
Instalments Deferred |
|
Balance-Due |
||||
|
Year-End |
|
January
2002 |
|
February 2002 |
|
March 2002 |
|
Day (BDD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Not Applicable[1] |
|
Not Applicable1 |
|
Extended to July 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Not Applicable[2] |
|
Extended to August 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Extended to
September 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Extended to September 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Extended to September 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Remains or extended to September 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Remains September or October 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
August 2002 |
|
Deferred to BDD |
|
Remains October or November 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
August 2002 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains November or December 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
August 2002 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains December 2002 or January 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
August 2002 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains January or February 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 2002 |
|
July 2002 |
|
August 2002 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains February or March 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2003 |
|
Not Applicable[3] |
|
August 2002 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains March or April 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2003 |
|
Not Applicable[4] |
|
Not
Applicable4 |
|
September 2002 |
|
Remains April or May 2003 |
Deductibility
of Meals at Construction Work Camps
The Budget proposes to expand the
ability to fully deduct business meals incurred for employees working at
certain “semi-remote” work sites. This
is one of the exceptions from the general rule that business meals and
entertainment expenses are only 50% deductible. Currently, in order to qualify for a full deduction, the meal
must be taken at a work site which is at least 30 kilometres from the nearest
urban area of at least 40,000 people, and the employee cannot be expected to
return home daily.
Commencing in 2002, the cost
of business meals provided by an employer to an employee will be fully
deductible where the employee is housed at a temporary work camp constructed or
installed for the purpose of providing meals and accommodation to employees
working at a construction site, provided that the employee cannot be expected
to return home daily. In addition, an
input tax credit will be allowed for the full amount of the goods and services
tax/harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) paid or payable by the employer for the cost
of the fully deductible meals provided at a qualifying construction work camp.
Improvements
to the Tax Incentives for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
To encourage investment in
small hydro-electric projects, the Budget proposes to increase the upper limit
on the size of small hydro-electric projects that qualify for the beneficial
capital cost allowance treatment of Class 43.1, from the current limit of an
annual average generating capacity of 15 megawatts (MW) to a maximum annual
rated capacity of 50 MW. The change
will apply to property acquired after December 10, 2001.
Furthermore, to encourage
energy efficient use of blast furnace gas by steel mills, an additional change
to Class 43.1 is proposed.
Venture
Capital – Partnerships
The Budget proposes two measures
to facilitate the use of limited partnerships by tax-exempt and foreign
investors in structuring their venture capital investments.
Currently, interests in
limited partnerships, other than qualified limited partnerships (QLPs), are
treated as foreign property for the purposes of the foreign content
restrictions applicable to registered retirement savings plans and other
deferred income plans. The Budget
proposed to eliminate one of the conditions for eligibility as a QLP.
After 2001, the Budget
proposes that a limited partnership may be a QLP even though a limited partner,
either alone or as part of a non-arm’s-length group, has more than a
30-per-cent ownership interest in the partnership. Nevertheless, for the purpose of the foreign property rules, any
limited partner or group that holds more than a 30-per-cent interest in a QLP
will be treated as owning a proportionate interest of each property owned by
the QLP, including any foreign property.
An ownership interest of 30 per cent or less in a QLP will remain exempt
from treatment as foreign property.
Use of Canadian Investment Managers
The Budget proposes that, for
2002 and subsequent taxation years, provided certain conditions are met, a
“qualified non-resident” will not be considered to be carrying on business in
Canada solely because a Canadian resident provides investment management and
administration services to the non-resident, or to a partnership of which the
non-resident is a member.
Personal
Tax Measures
Apprentice Vehicle Mechanics’ Tools Deduction
Individuals
employed as apprentice vehicle mechanics, who provide their own tools for the
on-the-job component of their apprenticeship, may get an income tax deduction for
a portion of the cost of new tools acquired after 2001. The amount of the
deduction will be the total cost of new tools acquired in a taxation year, less
the greater of $1,000 and 5 per cent of the individual’s apprenticeship income
for the year. Any part of the eligible deduction that is not claimed in the
year in which the tools are acquired, can be carried forward and deducted in
subsequent taxation years. If the
tools are later sold for an amount in excess of the acquisition cost less the
amount deducted, the excess amount constitutes income in the year of
disposition.
Adult Basic Education – Tax Deduction for Tuition Assistance
Under certain circumstances,
individuals may deduct, in computing their taxable income, the amount of
eligible tuition assistance received after 1996 for adult basic education that
has been included in their income.
Education Tax Credit
The Budget proposes to extend
the education tax credit to students who receive taxable assistance for
post-secondary education under certain government programs, including
employment insurance. This measure will apply to the 2002 and subsequent
taxation years.
Farm Property Rollover
Effective after December 10,
2001, the Budget proposes to extend the tax-deferred rollover of farm property
in Canada to include property used primarily in a woodlot business.
Goods and Services Tax Credit
Beginning with the GST credit
payable for July 2002, the Budget proposes that the credit will be based on an
individual’s family circumstances at the end of the preceding quarter, rather
than at the end of the preceding calendar year. Change in family circumstances
include events such as births, deaths, marriages, reaching the age of 19 years,
and becoming or ceasing to be a resident of Canada.
Other
Specific Tax Measures
On October 12, 2001, the
Government announced that the special tax treatment available for donations of certain
publicly traded securities to charities would be made permanent. Where a
capital gain results from the making of a gift of certain publicly traded
securities to a qualified donee, other than a private foundation, only 25% of
the capital gain will be taxable rather than the usual 50%. The types of
securities to which this reduced inclusion rate applies are securities listed
on a stock exchange, a share or unit of a mutual fund, an interest in a
segregated fund and a prescribed debt obligation. The Government also proposes to make permanent the measure that
reduces the tax on employment benefits in respect of donations of eligible
securities acquired through stock option plans.
Similar special treatment was introduced in February
2000 for the donation of ecologically sensitive land (and related easements,
covenants and servitudes) which is capital
property of the donor, whereby the income inclusion is also reduced to 25%
in respect of capital gains arising from gifts of such property to qualified
donees (such as Canada; a province; a municipality; or an approved registered
charity, one of the main purposes of which, in the opinion of the Minister of
the Environment, is the conservation and protection of Canada’s environmental
heritage). Since the special treatment
for ecologically sensitive land was introduced in 2000 as a permanent measure,
the Budget does not address these donations.
Gifts of ecologically sensitive land, which is not capital property of the donor, do not qualify for this special
treatment.
The ATSC will apply in respect of emplanements in
Canada, other than emplanements on connecting flights. The application and rate of the charge will
depend on where the airline ticket is purchased and the location of the travel
(i.e. whether it is domestic, transborder or other international travel). Transborder travel refers to travel between
Canada and the continental USA (i.e. not including Hawaii), or the island of
St. Pierre and Miquelon, that does not include any other international
travel. The rate of the charge for
transborder travel takes into account that other US security charges may also
apply.
The ATSC will apply to air travel purchased in
Canada on or after April 1, 2002, for air travel occurring on or after that
date. In this case, the ATSC’s are as
follows:
1)
For
travel wholly within Canada, $12 per emplanement, to a maximum of $24 per
ticket. For example, a return flight
from Toronto to Montreal would cost $24, because there were two separate
emplanements in Canada.
2)
For
transborder travel, $12 per emplanement in Canada, to a maximum of $24 per
ticket for two or more emplanements in Canada.
For example, a return flight from Toronto to Miami would cost $12,
because there was only one emplanement in Canada.
3)
For
travel from Canada to an international destination (including stopovers or
connections in the USA), $24.
For air travel purchased outside Canada, the ATSC
will be payable by the passenger at the time of emplanement at a Canadian
airport on a flight leaving Canada, unless the airline or its agent has
collected the charge at the time of the ticket purchase and evidence of the
payment is submitted by the passenger at the time of emplanement. The ATSC will apply to purchases made outside
Canada, for which payment is made on or after April 1, 2002, for air travel
that includes an emplanement in Canada after May 31, 2002. In this case, the ATSC’s are as follows:
1)
For
transborder travel, $12 per emplanement on a flight leaving Canada, to a
maximum of $24.
2)
For
other international travel, including connections or stopovers in the USA, $24.
The ATSC’s listed above include GST or the federal
portion of the HST.
* * *
To discuss the impact of the Budget on your
business, please contact your partner at Goldfarb, Shulman, Patel & Co.
LLP.
[1] See the January 2003 taxation year for the due dates of the February 2002 and March 2002 instalments.
[2] See the February 2003 taxation year for the due date of the March 2002 instalment.
[3] See the January 2002 taxation year for the due date of the January 2002 instalment.
[4] See the February 2002 taxation year for the due date of the January 2002 and February 2002 instalments.